Celebrate Manufacturing Day

On October 2nd, 2014, President Obama issued a proclamation declaring the first Friday of October as National Manufacturing Day. The proclamation says: “On National Manufacturing Day, more than 1,600 American manufacturers will open their doors and take up the important work of inspiring our young people to pursue careers in manufacturing and engineering. Today’s science, technology, engineering, and math graduates will power the next chapter of American production and innovation, and harnessing their potential is an economic imperative. When our manufacturing base is strong, our entire economy is strong. Today, we continue our work to bolster the industry at the heart of our Nation. With grit and resolve, we can create new jobs and widen the circle of opportunity for more Americans”. This year the annual Manufacturing Day arrives on Friday, October 2, and we’ll be quietly celebrating the achievements of American manufacturers in business for over 65 years by manufacturing some of the finest power electronics in the world. Because of the pandemic, we aren’t openly participating in the activities surrounding Manufacturing Day this year, however we don’t want to dampen the enthusiasm around such a worthy cause. As a manufacturer, we take pride in the work we do and appreciate the hard work that other U.S. manufacturers do.

Begun 2014, National Manufacturing Day was launched to address common misconceptions the public has about manufacturing. “By working together during and after Manufacturing Day, manufacturers will begin to address the skilled labor shortage they face, connect with future generations, take charge of the public image of manufacturing, and ensure the ongoing prosperity of the whole industry,” the organizers wrote. Sponsors include: the Alliance for American Manufacturing, the Fabricators and Manufacturers Association, the Manufacturing Institute, the National Association of Manufacturers, the National Institute of Standards & Technology, and the Precision Metalforming Association.

The goal of National Manufacturing Day is to educate the public as to:

  • What modern manufacturing facilities are really like these days.
  • What companies located in your community make and who they sell to.
  • What kinds of jobs are available in manufacturing.
  • What skills and education are needed to qualify for today’s manufacturing jobs.

In 2018, 275,000 people participated in 3,000 MFG Day events across North America. This year, we expect this day will be mostly virtual, but nevertheless enthusiastic and informative. And maybe next year, we’ll have the opportunity to join in the celebration fully.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Celebrate Manufacturing Day

Thank you for keeping the Railroads Running

To all railroad workers: We want to praise our friends in the railroad industry, the men and women that keep people and product moving, especially during this terrible pandemic time. We’ve been working with you for more than 25 years; we appreciate your business and the heroic effort you been making.

One of our specialties is providing AC-AC and DC-AC power supplies as well as auto transfer modules for railroad signaling applications. This is a mission-critical area in which absolute reliability is the standard. There is no room for error when it comes to railroad signal and safety. And our clients have come to trust in our equipment so much that we have become the brand name in this specialty.

Our power supplies range from 300 Watts to several thousand watts.

We offer many options such as AAR terminals, Alarms with contact closures and indicator, Input delay, Slides and Ruggedized units with conformal coating.

Our customer base ranges across many railroads in the US and signal companies.

Before going any further, though, let’s take a moment to discuss the basics of railway signaling for our friends in other fields. Railway signaling goes back to the mid-nineteenth century when signalmen used flags and a variety of semaphore signs. By the latter part of the century, the myriad railroad operations began to unify around a set of guidelines called the Standard Code of Operating Rules (SCOR), produced by the Association of American Railroads. To this day, the SCOR guidelines are the grand-daddy of all North American railroad signaling rulebooks.

Now, most Class I railroads in the U.S. use one of two sets of rules: the Northeast Operating Rules Advisory Committee (NORAC) rulebook and the General Code of Operating Rules (GCOR). Amtrak, Conrail and several commuter systems and short-line railroads in the northeastern U.S. use the NORAC rulebook. The GCOR is used by every Class I railroad west of the Mississippi River, most of the Class II railroads and numerous short-line tracks. A few operators, including CSX, Norfolk Southern (NS), Illinois Central, Metro North and Florida East Coast, have adopted their own rulebooks. In the case of NS and CSX, the NORAC rulebook was integrated into their existing rules structure with the Conrail merger. Metro-North uses a rulebook based on NORAC. The Long Island Rail Road still uses a rulebook that is based on SCOR. So railway signals can vary somewhat from one system to another. Here’s a page displaying the various NORAC signals as an example.

Posted in AC Power, Transportation | Comments Off on Thank you for keeping the Railroads Running


Written by: Gerald Hovdestad – Director COTS Engineering –                                                   Member of VITA committee 46.11, 62 & 65


The latest power supply technology finally catches up to the past, as              VPX goes ‘back to the future.’

 Back in the “good old days,” the power supply mantra for all power supplies was Standard, Modified Standard, or Custom Designed. Often that translated into lowest cost, slightly more expensive, and too expensive for my system. In the 1970s, the US Government Department of Defense (DoD) started moving toward the purchase and use of commercial-off-the-shelf products (COTS), whenever they could find proven technology in the commercial marketplace that met their requirements, or could easily be reconfigured to do so.

In 1994, Secretary of Defense, William J. Perry, released a document asking the military to increase its purchase of commercial items. Shortly thereafter, COTS was further addressed in the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act (FASA); the Clinger-Cohen Act; the Federal Acquisition Regulation; the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation; and the basic DoD Acquisition Policy (5000 series).  As a result, the term COTS increasingly replaced the term Standard, and Modified COTS was often the descriptor for a standard product that was modified to meet a specific requirement.

VPX emerged in the early 2000s as a viable way to scale backplane technology. VPX, formerly known as VITA 46, is an ANSI standard. It was defined by VITA (VME International Trade Association), a working group that includes many major companies in the electronics marketplace. [Disclosure: Jerry Hovdestad, the Director of COTS Engineering at Behlman and the author of this paper, sits on a number of VITA committees involved in Open VPX.] 

The value of VPX technology cannot be overstated, as it not only provides for standardization that enables interconnectivity between VPX products from many manufacturers, but also promotes new generations of embedded computing systems with high-speed serial switched fabric interconnects.  However, for all its advantages, the very standards that made VPX possible in the first place provide limitations which, in some circumstances, make it difficult to achieve the desired end result. This is especially evident in certain 3U and 6U VPX power supplies.

Power supplies have always been the problem child in electronic system design. Very often, high-end systems are configured for specialized applications and, as a result, power requirements tend to be quite different from one configuration to another. VITA attempted to standardize some aspects of VME system design, which also put some constraints on power. Mechanical standards were agreed upon for circuit cards, and there was an effort to organize voltages and their characteristics, such as regulation, noise, ripple, and rise time. There was really no successful attempt to control the size and shape of VME power supplies.

After the introduction of VPX standard VITA 46, the standardization process continued to advance and define many more features of system cards. Chassis, backplane, and card profiles are defined in VITA 65, although this appears to be a monster with unlimited growth potential. In addition, specification VITA 62 was written in an effort to further standardize VPX power supplies. This specification defines mechanical configurations, connectors, voltages, and general interfaces, so that system integrators can design platforms with standard backplanes and be able to plug in power supply cards from a variety of suppliers. The expectation was that cards from these different manufacturers would function properly and identically. This may actually work with some less complex systems, but there are still many variables, such as user-defined pins, which allow designers to make use of sophisticated, “undefined” features. These are specification enhancements offered by only some power supply manufacturers, even if they are VITA 62 compliant. A further complication is the programmability often offered with these power supplies, which is very loosely defined in the VITA 46.11 system management specification.  VITA 62 does define a starting point that system designers can use for basic power requirements. They must add actual power levels, as well as decide how to incorporate other undefined system power needs. EMI filtering, hold-up requirements, and transient and lightning protection are just some of the possible considerations. If multiple cards are used, shared circuit performance, compatibility, sensing, and synchronization are issues that must be resolved.  The Vita 62 specification, as currently released, allows for considerable flexibility in requirements. Output currents for each allowable voltage are the parameters that are most variable. Seldom does a power supply company see two requirements with the same output power levels. Therefore, it is very important that the products being offered are able to be tailored to meet these needs.

System integrators should not be afraid to ask for what they really need, and the power supply manufacturer must be able to discuss these needs and offer solutions which are acceptable to that individual program. For some programs, it might be important to stick with a fully compliant power supply, while other programs may allow some configuration changes in the interest of saving cost or size.

One example is a system with a 5 V 120 A requirement, and a lower power requirement on the 12 V and 3.3 V outputs. This type of situation is fairly common, because there are some processor assemblies widely used in VPX systems that require a significant amount of 5 V. Standard 3U VPX cards are available with outputs up to 5 V @ 40 A because the pins designated for the 5 V output are rated at 40 A. One system designer may opt to use three cards to meet the requirement and stay fully compliant with the VITA 62 specification, while another may opt for some tailoring of the card in order to reduce size and cost. This system designer may opt for one standard card and a second card with two 5 V outputs by replacing the 12 V on that card with a second 5 V. This would save a card slot, and the cost of the power supply would be roughly 33% less as a result of the reduced number of cards. Each program designer must decide what degree of specification compliance or deviation is acceptable. The designer should not be reluctant to discuss the requirement with his supplier, because this interaction is usually the best way to optimize the design. In fact, it is important to consult with the power supply manufacturer very early in the design stage, since the reconfiguration of the power supply could affect other parts of the system design which, if not considered early, could add cost for reworking and time to the process. 

Besides hardware requirements, VPX power supply software capability is also important for system customization and optimization. Modern power supplies can offer significant design flexibility. While IPMI based VITA 46.11 can be used to optimize system performance, there should be a more detailed definition of programmable functions. Some manufacturers continue to use a PMBus based I2C structure, because the functions available are well defined. When we talk about tailoring a system, this structure allows many desirable features. Some of the features that could be tailored include over-voltage, over-current, temperature warnings, and limits. It is quite common to see wide variations in these requirements from system to system, and it would be quite difficult and expensive to have each variation fixed in hardware. The ability to program these settings enables the use of standard hardware. Temperature warnings and limits are other factors that are often system dependent, and the ability to set these parameters can greatly enhance system performance. The ability to read output and input currents is also something that can be used by a system programmer to monitor operational performance and diagnose system problems.

VITA 62 is an important step forward in the effort to have an Open VPX Standard power supply, but there is still significant work to be done to meet existing and emerging system needs. Several hardware areas are not adequately covered by established standards, and software definitions need to be addressed. In the area of hardware, there is no real definition of an energy storage card that would allow system designers and manufacturers to have a standard configuration. While VITA 62 does mention these devices, there is no connector pin assignment. As a minimum, we need to define input and output pins for such a card. It would also be desirable to have some basic logic and control functions defined, such as “card ready” or “fault.” Another area that needs work is a specification for three-phase inputs for 3U cards. The current 3U connector does not have sufficient input pins for this function. The original VITA 62 committee did not foresee a need for this, but many systems now have such a requirement. There is, however, a present effort to have some of these loose ends solidified. In addition to VITA, industry attention has been growing in the VPX arena. The DoD “Host” for hardware and “Fast” for software are just two of the industry thrusts to reinforce the Open VPX Standard.

Behlman actively participates in appropriate VITA committees and offers a wide variety of both standard and existing nonstandard VPX power cards, while also offering system designers the opportunity to explore whatever reconfiguration is required for maximum performance and economy. For example, working within its new VPXtra™ Reconfiguration Program, Behlman has modified the VPXtra™ 500M to create the new VPXtra™500M1 with 80 Amps of 5 VDC output. This unit, in conjunction with the standard VPXtra™ 500M, can supply 120 Amps of 5 VDC, along with the customer-required 12 VDC and 3.3 VDC.

The Behlman VPXtra™ Reconfiguration Program is designed to address all of these needs, and more. This program has already resulted in an impressive list of new, non-typical, COTS VPX power supply models (3U 3-phase AC to DC; High Voltage Hold-up card, Low Voltage Hold-up card; PS with extra 5 VDC, 6U 3-phase and single-phase AC to DC, PS with extra 12 VDC, and PS with extra 5 VDC). But that is only the beginning, as illustrated in the Behlman advertisement below.

Behlman now invites all system designers to request additional system-specific VPXtra™ reconfigurations, without the cost of full-custom development. 

Behlman conducts conferences with concerned system designers, in which they specify and discuss their typical and non-typical VPX power supply requirements, which can vary significantly from system to system. Variables can range from different power levels of the standard voltages, to mechanical configurations, such as connectors, user-defined pins, and general interfaces. EMI filtering and hold-up requirements, as well as transient and lightning protection, are other possible considerations. All-in-all, it turns out that industry standards set for VPX power supplies do not always satisfy the needs of systems requiring VPX power supplies.

The Behlman VPXtra™ Reconfiguration Program is designed to address all of these needs, and more. This program has already resulted in an impressive list of new, non-typical, COTS VPX power supply models (3U 3-phase AC to DC; High Voltage Hold-up card, Low Voltage Hold-up card; PS with extra 5 VDC, 6U 3-phase and single-phase AC to DC, PS with extra 12 VDC, and PS with extra 5 VDC). But that is only the beginning, as illustrated in the Behlman advertisement below.  Although standardization may have been expected to meet current and future VPX needs, it soon became apparent that emerging systems required modifications that were not easy for some manufacturers to provide, while also maintaining VITA compatibility. With the Behlman VPXtra™ Reconfiguration Program, VPXtra™3U and 6U Power Supplies are able to maintain VITA and Open VPX compatibility, as they step “back to the future” to join the hundreds of other standard COTS AC and DC power supplies, inverters, and UPS units in the Behlman line that have been readily reconfigurable for decades — without full-custom cost  to give system designers greater flexibility, improved system performance, and lower total cost.  A growing list with specs for available 3U and 6U standard and non-standard reconfigured VPXtra™ Power Supplies is available upon request, by sending an email to sales@behlman.com. Some of these are so new that data and spec sheets are not yet published, but data and spec sheets for many can already be downloaded at http://www.behlman.com/products-detail/vpx-3u-power-supply.   http://www.behlman.com/products-detail/vpx-6u-power-supply

For more information, contact Behlman Electronics Inc., 80 Cabot Court, Hauppauge, New York 11788 USA; TEL: +1 631 435-0410; FAX: +1 631 951-4341; sales@behlman.com; www.behlman.com.

Posted in VPX | Comments Off on VPX YOUR WAY

Is Your Factory Power Source Corrupting Your Product Testing?

On November 7, 2013 our blog asks “Is Your Factory Power Source Corrupting Your Product Testing?” this blog / white paper is a detail extension of the previous blog.

Written by Steve Boegle, Lead Engineer sboegle@behlman.com


This paper describes the use of AC power supplies for product testing. It will also discuss the use of regulated electronic AC power supplies to perform the various tests. General test examples are discussed as well as the parameters that are important to selecting an AC supply to perform them. Application examples are provided.

When it comes to designing and testing electrical and electronic equipment, having a consistently stable source of AC power is essential. While the AC power in your engineering laboratory or manufacturing facility may be reliable in terms of availability, it may not be sufficiently predicable for accurate, repeatable testing. In addition, not being able to control the voltage and frequency may also limit its use. A regulated electronic AC supply can solve power quality issues as well as provide additional testing flexibility.

Occasional power quality issues can disrupt your operations. AC mains fluctuations in a typical production facility are a result of heavy loads that vary during a typical day. In addition to voltage fluctuations and distortion there is also the possibility of high voltage, high frequency transients caused by nearby load switching, lightening, and electro-magnetic interference from faulty or improperly installed devices connected to the same line. Even under normal conditions variations of +/- 5% at the point of service are within typical power utility specifications. The actual facility distribution system wiring will also affect the voltage delivered to any individual outlet. Three phase systems may also suffer from phase imbalance due to poorly distributed single phase loads. Any voltage fluctuations at the point of testing become more apparent as the power level of the product being tested increases. Electronic supplies like the Behlman P1350 series can reduce voltage variations to below 1% over specified line and load conditions.

Deviations in voltage and harmonic distortion can have a large impact on test results. When making efficiency measurements, variations in the applied voltage over time will impact results. Power factor and in-rush current measurements will be affected by line impedance. In a typical factory this impedance varies over time and with location within the facility (distance to service entrance). Varying line impedance can also be a problem when performing certain commercial product tests where the impedance must be known or measured. Use of a regulated AC supply can allow for a standardization of tests results.

Product Design and Development

Product development often requires testing at operating limits or beyond. The inability to accurately measure incremental differences in design changes or to verify stated product specifications can result in a number of problems for manufacturers. In addition to potentially costly additional engineering and product delays, there could be reliability and safety ramifications. Ultimately, customer satisfaction may be compromised.

The electronic AC power supply can be a useful tool for evaluation of products and sub-assemblies used in a final product. The ability to verify the performance of items like transformers, fans, relays, actuators, and other ac operated components prior to use in the final product will allow designers to weed out problem components before they reach the customer. The ability to vary the applied AC can also allow designers to conduct “what if” scenarios to push or improve existing designs. The inclusions of meters to monitor voltage, current, power, and frequency further enhance their usefulness. Just like a DC bench supply, a bench top AC power supply can be a valuable asset to any engineering or test department.


Behlman Model P1351, 1.2kVA Single Phase Bench Top AC Power Supply

Production Test

Many commercial safety test standards require the application of operating voltages and frequencies above or below normal limits. Although voltage adjustment can be accomplished with tapped transformers and variable auto-transformers, they still suffer from poor voltage regulation with load and line changes. This makes adjusting the test voltage like trying to shoot a moving target. In addition, the cost of quality adjustable auto-transformers (also known as “Variacs”) has increased dramatically in recent years. Another disadvantage of this method is that it cannot vary the AC line frequency. For products intended for international sales, a frequency range of 47 -63 Hertz is often specified in IEC (International Electro-technical Commission) test specifications. For the aviation industry frequencies in the range of 360 – 880 Hz are common.

Electronic AC supplies are well suited for production line testing in both large and small manufacturing facilities. They can be used to provide bulk regulated AC to test stands and fixtures. Automated control features like computer or analog control via PLCs are available to suit most needs. Control via RS-232, IEEE-488, USB and Ethernet interfaces are common. Single phase systems in the range of 500VA to 40KVA and 3 phase systems in the 1kVA to 120KVA are available from various suppliers. They range from reference quality instruments to modified UPSs.


Various 3 phase AC power supply models from 1 – 20 kVA
Selecting the Proper AC Power Supply for Testing Needs.

Once the decision is made to purchase an AC power supply there are certain considerations that must be evaluated. Obvious things like output voltage, current, and frequency range are determined by user needs and/or third party test specifications.
Although these parameters are an important first step, other issues related to the type of product being tested must be considered. Surge currents and possible non-linear currents associated with the tested products must be accounted for. Products that incorporate pumps, compressors or other motor driven loads present issues that can cause test failures due to the high starting currents required. Products with non-linear input currents can cause distortion of the AC output.

Other considerations must be made based on the type of test being performed. A simple functional test requires less consideration than qualifying a product for efficiency or making power factor measurements. Certain IEC test specifications actually describe and require verification of the short circuit current available from the AC power source. This is an attempt to provide some sort of standardization so that test results can be compared. One example would be quantifying product in-rush current or motor locked rotor current. If the AC supply used does not have sufficient transient capability the test can be invalid. A high source impedance during testing can mask the true in-rush current experienced when the product is used in its intended application. The implication here is that certain tests are better served by over sizing the AC supply to provide a low source impedance. Consultation with the AC source manufacturers engineering staff can help with sizing the power source for a particular test.
Special Considerations for Testing Motors or Products with Motors.

AC induction motors with capacitive starting are the most common type encountered in modern single phase products. These motors are inexpensive, reliable, and create the least amount of EMI as they do not use brushes. Three phase induction motors do not even require capacitors for starting. Motors in general present difficulties for all types AC sources due to what is referred to as the “Locked Rotor Current” or LRA. The amount of current dawn by an AC induction motor is dependent on rotor speed. The applied voltage creates a rotating magnetic field. This causes the rotor to move due to magnetic repulsion. When the rotor and magnetic field are close in speed, the current is at minimum. The problem is the current required to get the rotor moving. The AC supply must overcome the friction and load presented to the rotor which drives the output shaft. This current is the locked rotor current. If the rotor were held from rotating with voltage applied, the current will be at and stay at maximum.

The time period the LRA current must be applied depends on the motor construction and the mechanical load at start-up. Air conditioning compressors and liquid pumps are some worst case examples of where the start current duration can be several cycles of the AC waveform to several seconds. Motor manufacturers normally rate their product to either IEC or NEMA ( National Electrical Manufacturers Association) standards. IEC standards provide values for typical start currents for different size induction motors. NEMA tables provide this information in the form of voltage amperes during start up. This information, along with the type of test to be done, should be known before selecting the AC power source.

Behlman AC supplies can be used to successfully test motors without over specifying their power rating. For a typical functional or burn in test the supply need only be rated for the continuous “run” current. Several methods could be used for motor starting that would reduce the overall continuous power requirement. Behlman also provides models with a motor test option (MT). These units feature oversized output devices that allow much higher transient currents than a standard model while maintaining the size and pricing of a unit rated to only supply the run current. All Behlman AC power supplies also provide a constant current mode. This mode will automatically reduce the output voltage to limit current while maintaining a sinusoidal current waveform. This action will allow the motor to soft start. The following paragraphs are examples of motor starting methods.

Soft Start (fixed).

This method is in common use for starting motors induction AC motors. A reduced voltage is applied to get the rotor spinning. Once the rotor is up to speed, the voltage is allowed to reach the rated running value. This method works well for both single phase and 3 phase motors that do not have a substantial mechanical load at start up (low starting torque). Commercial motor starter are available and can be as simple a fixed resistor in series with the motor winding that is switched out once the motor has started. Other more sophisticated versions allow for adjustable starting voltages as well as adjustable timing. Timing and voltage levels are determined from motor specifications or empirical testing. The constant current mode provided by Behlman power supplies creates this condition automatically. This can also make testing safer as the motor housing will not tend move when started. Behlman has provided this solution to a manufacturer of vacuum cleaner motors. Their existing test stands started the motor from the line. Due to high torque during starting, the motor had to be clamped to the test stand so it would not leap or roll off during the test. The constant current mode of the Behlman model BL1350 allowed functional testing without restraining the motor. This allowed for a decrease in test set-up time and nuisance fuse tripping in the test stand. Although the start current exceeded 20 Arms when connected to the line, the 10A rated power supply was able to soft start the motor and bring it to its nominal run current of about 5 amps.

Soft Start (Ramp up)

For this method the test voltage is applied by connecting the motor to the supply and then causing the voltage to ramp up to the run value. This works well for applications requiring a bit more control of starting torque. This method has been incorporated into modified versions of Behlman AC supplies to allow compressors and pumps to start from smaller units than would be required by random application of the test voltage. For really tough products like high pressure pumps, the voltage and frequency can both be ramped. This is similar to what is done in VFD (Variable Frequency Drives) circuits. This method allows for controlled torque and acceleration. To perform this type of test, a supply with either analog remote control or computer remote control would be useful. Both types are available from Behlman and other vendors.

Brute Force Method

Some products are designed with control circuits that do not respond well to reduced operating voltages. In addition, some motor tests do not allow for limited current or voltage during starting. One example might be a test that attempts to quantify the typical start current for a given product. In these cases, the AC power supply must have sufficient transient power capacity to get the load started. The Behlman motor test option (MT) provides this solution. These models are designed to allow a very high short term output currents for periods typically on the order of 500mSec. This is accomplished by over sizing the output amplifier devices (IGBTs in these models) and tailoring the current limit response to allow a particular starting transient. In some cases the AC supplies have been tailored to a particular motor or product. Again, consultation with the AC power supply manufacturer is a good place to begin. The figures below illustrate some of the starting conditions previously discussed.

Figure 1 : Small shop vac started with Model P1350. This illustrates the brute force approach. Note that the maximum RMS current value exceeds the unit’s 10 amp rating. ( top trace = 100V/div)
( bottom trace = 20A/div)
Figure 2 : Small shop vac soft started with the same model P1350. The voltage was set to zero than adjusted to 115V
using the front panel control.

Using and an electronic AC supply for product testing can provide accurate and repeatable test results. Models that provide variable frequency and voltage can also be an asset for use with product development. Specifying the correct supply for a given test is important to avoid possible costly delays and the purchase of a supply that is either too small or complete overkill. The test engineer should have a clear understanding of the product being tested and actual test requirements. Once the requirements are understood a discussion with the AC supply manufacturer should be able to pin point the correct model.

Posted in AC Power | Comments Off on Is Your Factory Power Source Corrupting Your Product Testing?

Is Your Factory Power Source Corrupting Your Product Testing?

When it comes to product testing new electrical and electronic equipment, having a consistently reliable source of AC power is of paramount importance
While you may feel confident that the AC power lines in your manufacturing plant or design facility are reliable in terms of consistent availability, when you really think about it, you may feel somewhat less than certain that these sources are providing the power quality needed for accurate product test measurements.

Even an occasional power quality problem can disrupt your operations. All it takes is sufficient deviation from norms in the power supplied from your factory’s AC main during a product test to cause obvious operational problems in the equipment being tested. The symptoms of poor power quality caused by surges and spikes, transients, blackouts, noise and sags are often readily apparent, leading to such problems as equipment failures, safety hazards, process interruptions and shutdowns. Often, though, there are more subtle fluctuations in voltage that do not result in such obvious problems. Nevertheless, these can wreak havoc on product performance and efficiency test measurements.pf1351

AC-main voltage fluctuations in a typical production facility often result from the wide variety of heavy-duty machinery in use throughout the facility at different times of the day. Such varying power usage can cause large swings in voltage at a factory’s individual circuit locations, rendering them unable to provide the AC power necessary for accurate and consistent test measurements.

Designs of AC motors, solenoids, levers and actuators must have predictable performance characteristics that engineers can rely on to achieve design goals. The inability to accurately measure incremental differences in the performance of each design change of a product, or to verify stated product specifications and efficiency, can result in a number of problems for manufacturers. In addition to the potentially huge costs associated with additional engineering and testing (and the resulting delays in getting a product to market), final product performance and reliability may be compromised or unpredictable, the need for repairs may increase, the product may not meet its published specs, efficiency ratings may be reduced and, ultimately, customer satisfaction will be negatively impacted. In a worst-case scenario, a good product design can be unnecessarily scrapped.

Selecting the right power supply can make a difference for any manufacturer experiencing AC-related problems. A power supply for a production test facility must be robust and rugged enough to handle the demands of a factory environment, while being able to deliver clean, regulated AC output regardless of input fluctuations. Variable voltage and frequency capabilities should be included to enable testing at high and low limits. A motor-test option with fold-back/soft-start capabilities can deliver significant time and cost benefits, and remote-control or computer-control features for automated testing can be invaluable in a large production test facility. (Behlman’s Motor Test option has high peak current capability and a fold-back feature used to soft-start motors.)

The bottom line is that the right AC power supply can ensure absolutely predictable and consistent power for equipment testing, which can save a tremendous amount of time and money, as well as perhaps even the reputation of a manufacturer.

[Portions of this post are adapted from previous articles written by the author for Behlman Electronics.]

Posted in AC Power | Leave a comment

Best Practices to Choose a COTS Power Supply Vendor

With the proliferation of commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) products being offered for military use since the 1990s, it is all too easy to be lulled into believing that COTS products are always the most economical. That is not always true.

For more than a decade, the U.S. Department of Defense has stressed the need to use COTS components wherever possible as a way to reduce the total cost of ownership of military systems. However, because military systems are typically required to have a service life of 20 years or more while being subject to the extreme rigors of shipboard, airborne or mobile military applications, standard COTS products that appear to be satisfactory at first may not readily meet the longevity requirements and rugged performance specifications for the task at hand.

Modified COTS

In the case of power supplies, ruggedized COTS products with some necessary modifications can be the ideal solution. They still deliver the cost benefits and streamlined development time of a standard COTS product but with the features and performance necessary for military applications.

Modified COTS power supplies from qualified vendors have delivered the value and performance required by all branches of the military, in a broad range of applications and systems. The right  power  supply  vendor will have significant design engineering  experience with  power supplies  for military applications  and  whenever necessary will  take  a partnered   approach with armed  forces managers, prime contractors and system  integrators to ensure that the modified  COTS power supply precisely meets all performance specifications, on budget and on schedule.

A preferred approach to designing cost-effective  modified COTS AC-DC or DC-DC power  supplies is to use standard DC-DC modules (COTS “bricks”), along with the necessary circuitry and mechanical and thermal design considerations to meet specifications. This approach significantly reduces non-associated costs, as well as reducing turnaround times.

The importance of choosing the right vendor for this approach cannot be overstated. For example, some power supply manufacturers advertise power densities in excess of 70 watts per cubic inch. Unfortunately, upon closer inspection, you’ll find that the manufacturer’s data also shows that the advertised power density is only achieved at moderately low temperatures and at a specific input and output voltage. Oftentimes, the advertised power density figures do not account for additional necessary  components needed to meet the complete power system specification, and the result is an overall power system power density of between 10 to 15 watts per cubic inch — much lower than the advertised 70 watts.

When choosing the right power supply, there are several issues that need to be considered to ensure a reliable design that meets all specifications (as well as meeting all advertised performance parameters). Consulting with the vendor, you should be able to arrive at the answers to questions such as the following:

  • Which standard module is best suited for the application at hand?
  • What needs to be done to meet EMI requirements of MIL-STD-461?
  • What needs to be done to meet hold-up and transient requirements of MIL-STD-704?
  • What needs to be done to meet MIL- STD-1399 requirements?
  • Should conduction or convection cooling be used to meet temperature requirements?
  • Do the power supplies need to be paralleled?
  • Is redundancy and N+I required?
  • Which control circuits are necessary?
  • And is built-in test (BIT) required?

In addition, the power supply vendor should be able to specify the inclusion and impact of such elements as protection circuitry, filtering, monitoring and control, environmental conditions, and the physical size and weight of the finished power supply in order to produce a reliable power supply meeting all system and environmental requirements.

Posted in COTS | Leave a comment

Quality: Proudly Made in the U.S.A.

One of the first things you’ll notice on our website is an icon of an American flag with the words “Proudly made in the U.S.A.” around it. It symbolizes our commitment to excellence in the work we do as a provider of cutting-edge power electronics built using flat-out American know-how. It may sound old-fashioned, but we think it reminds us that we are part of a long tradition of dedication to American craftsmanship.  That tradition of high-quality craftsmanship was once the hallmark of manufacturing in this country, and we would like to see that tradition restored.

Much has been made about the Manufacturing Renaissance in the United States going on over the last few years. The trend in sourcing products recently has seen the pendulum shift as more and more U.S. companies have relocated their manufacturing back to our shores from overseas. We think the biggest reason for this reshoring movement has been due to quality work, especially in high-tech applications. And we’re not alone. Consider what the experts on this subject have to say.

Harry Moser is the head of the Chicago-based nonprofit Reshoring Initiative, as well as an Industry Week Manufacturing Hall of Fame member and the recipient of the 2012 Quality Professional of the Year award from Quality Magazine. Moser recently wrote in a Design News article: “The Reshoring Initiative tracks all reported and some private cases of reshoring and concludes that more than 100,000 manufacturing jobs have been reshored since January 1, 2010. Many companies cite quality as a main component when deciding to reshore manufacturing to the U.S.”

Last month, National Association of Manufacturers President and CEO Jay Timmons delivered the annual State of Manufacturing address in Houston. In it, he declared, “Manufacturers in America are making more products today and making them better than ever before.” He cited a cover story from Barron’s Magazine about the U.S. manufacturing “revival” and commented:  “They see what those of us in manufacturing have always known: this industry has driven the innovation and created the opportunity that’s made the American economy the envy of the world.”

Larry Gigerich, managing director for Ginovus, a facility location consulting firm based in Indianapolis, told Area Development Online: “Quality concerns are a big reason higher-value and more technical products are looking to come back to the U.S.”

We think these comments are revealing. At Behlman Electronics, though, we’ve known that quality is the key to high-tech American manufacturing all along. For more than 50 years, we’ve been building the highest quality standard, modified standard, custom and COTS AC power sources, frequency converters, inverters, DC-DC, AC-DC, DC-AC, and uninterruptible power sources (UPS) for commercial, industrial, and military mission-critical applications. Please give us a call to discuss your next project’s quality requirements.









Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Catching Up With the Latest in the VPX World

We haven’t focused on VPX technology in a while, so we figured you might like to read a post about some of the things that have been going on in the world of VPX recently that have caught our eye. While there haven’t been any big announcements coming out of VITA lately, there are a couple of trends we’ve noticed that do merit mentioning.

In the online pages of Military & Aerospace Electronics magazine, John Keller reports on how the ongoing pressure the U.S. military is feeling to reduce procurement costs is affecting the makers of embedded systems, especially in terms of adhering to industry standards such as VPX, OpenVPX, and VME. In his article Cost Quickly Becoming a Central Concern for Embedded Computing Backplanes and Chassis, Keller notes that in the current belt-tightening environment military decision-makers are putting greater emphasis in getting more bangs for their bucks than in standardizing their gear.

“Today ever-tightening military technology budgets and the imperative to do more with less are encouraging military electronic systems designers to put their priorities on functionality and cost, and leave architectural choices as secondary considerations,” Keller writes. “On one hand, it can be beneficial to embedded computing providers, because as military budgets shrink, prime contractors are willing to contract out increasing amounts of electronic system work in efforts to attack costs. On the other end, embedded computing suppliers are under more pressure to keep costs low than ever before. This can lead them to unconventional approaches that are less expensive than standard favorites like VME, VPX, and OpenVPX.”

Meanwhile, back at VITA headquarters, the organization’s semi-annual report on the industry contained similar guidance for its members. “[U]ncertainty continues to impact the VME to VPX transition,” white-paper author Ray Alderman writes.  He notes, in this regard, that “VME will continue stronger than expected, with the inflection point moved out beyond 2016” as a transition point. “VITA members are reporting strong design-in activity and the work on remaining specificaitons is moving forward at a rapid pace,” Alderman reports. His final word on the industry in general offers us some comfort: “There is reason for optimism in several military market sub-segments, if you are an innovative engineering-driven company.”

Here at Behlman, we like to think that we’re in the “innovative engineering-driven” category, and we have an optimistic view of the future for VPX technology. For Behlman OpenVPX products, please go to http://www.behlmanvpx.com/index.htm.

Posted in Aerospace industry | Leave a comment

Powering Up an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle

The utility of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) is unquestioned. They are quickly assuming responsibility for much of the surveillance and reconnaissance work previously handled by human pilots in the armed forces. And the range of possible future applications, both in military and civilian settings, for UAVs only grows with every passing year.

So, making sure that the newest UAVs come equipped with the latest in technology, at a reasonable price tag, represents an enormous challenge for their manufacturers.

Take the case of the Northrop Grumman RQ-4 Global Hawk, one of the most-sophisticated UAVs in the U.S. military’s arsenal. It can fly for 28 hours without refueling over hostile territory, surveying 40,000 square miles of terrain. From a height of 60,000 feet, a Global Hawk can capture images of enemy facilities that are so clear that intelligence officials can determine the make, model and license plates of ground vehicles parked nearby. And the Global Hawk will never put the life of an American flier on the line.UAV Power Supplies

The RQ-4 is powered by an Allison Rolls-Royce AE3007H turbofan engine, providing 7,050 lbf (31.4 kN) of thrust, and carries a 1-ton (900 kg) payload of sensors and communications equipment. A conduction oil-cooled generator provides 78 kVA of 6-phase 124 Vac, 433 Hz to 580 Hz, to run the onboard electronics for its payload systems.

Behlman provides the Global Hawk team with our BL+30 electronic frequency converter (see photo) as part of the maintenance crew’s Power Cart, used to test components of the system when it is on the ground.

We’re proud to be involved in such an important effort.

Posted in AC Power, Aerospace industry | Leave a comment

Offshore Oil and Gas Exploration Power Supplies

There are few things as complex and challenging as offshore oil and gas drilling. Imagine taking an already difficult and dangerous process and transporting it miles out into the open ocean. It is hard to navigate a modern ship in the same conditions, so taking what amounts to a floating city/factory, often taller than a skyscraper, and putting it in the middle of nowhere boarders on the impossible. Oh, and let’s not forget the billions of dollars involved in finding, let alone extracting, the oil and gas.

Yet, as humanity demands more fossil fuels everyday, companies have ventured farther and deeper into the oceans of the world. To get an idea how far out to sea and how much water is beneath some of these platforms, Shell’s Perdido floats 200 miles off the Texas coast in water as deep as five Empire State Buildings.

With all the difficulties and costs involved in placing these offshore rigs, there is another level of problems when it comes to powering these behemoths. Being tens if not hundreds of miles out to sea, it is not as if you can just hook up a few cables to the local power grid. These rigs contain a slew of generators, engines, and mechanical systems, all demanding a constant and reliable flow of electricity. One mistake, like a power arc, can lead to disaster far from help.

At Behlman, we understand the unique power challenges facing offshore oil and gas platforms. While every situation is unique, we do offer a number of products aimed at keeping electricity flowing smoothly and safely in even the most difficult offshore applications.  Behlman has modified a number of COTS AC supplies to handle the unique problems of offshore oil and gas drilling. The changes include adding such features as:

  • HV AC output
  • Master-Slave capability
  • RS-232 and RS-485 interface
  • Custom metering
  • Transit cases
  • NEMA enclosures

These custom features can be found on a number of different models including:

One of the most important things to understand is that each offshore oil and gas drilling platform is unique in its construction and capabilities. Because of this, almost every system aboard is customized to match the needs present. If you want to learn more about the offshore oil and gas drilling process and industry we suggest starting with one of the many informational website available including this one at howstuffworks.com.

Posted in Oil and gas exploration, Uncategorized | Leave a comment